On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> damien so may be we should have
>        valueAt: or elementAt:

Good idea, that would reinforce the parallel with Dictionary.

> Now may be we should have different tests.
> This is important to get the tests green since this is a goal of pharo 1.0

Well, it's easy to have green tests, just comment out the assertions.
Or remove the broken code. I mean, there is a problem with how that
class behaves, compared to the other collections.

> On Nov 1, 2008, at 5:11 PM, Damien Pollet wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 3:57 PM, nicolas cellier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> While running TestRunner, i noticed this:
>>>
>>> LinkedListTest>>testTAdd does an infinite loop.
>>
>> yes, this is fixed in the next commit in PharoInbox.
>>
>>> Anyway, I find LinkedList is NOT a generic Collection but rather a single
>>> not reusable hack for Process.
>>
>> Exactly. The tests do not loop anymore, but now some fail because
>> LinkedList is not polymorphic with other SequenceableCollections, e.g
>> you cannot do LinkedList new add: 42 because it expects instances of
>> Link as elements.
>>
>>> This is regularly bugging newcomers, and I would recommend an evolution
>>> toward something like
>>>
>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/beginners/2008-July/004835.html
>>
>> Great! I will have a look at that.
>>
>>> That is, Link should be a transparent-implementation-defined-intermediate
>>> not visible via standard add:/remove:/do: messages.
>>> User should not have to provide a Link, but only the value.
>>
>> Well I think there should be a linked-list-specific protocol for
>> dealing with links, either via link objects or by delegation through
>> LinkedList. But this should not overlap with the
>> SequenceableCollection protocol.
>>
>>> Only LinkedList specialized messages like addLink: removeLink: linksDo:
>>> should deal with user provided Link for more advanced features.
>>> Think of Dictionary and Association. A user can use Dictionary with: at:
>>> /
>>> at:put: without knowing about Association.
>>
>> Exactly
>>
>> --
>> Damien Pollet
>> type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>



-- 
Damien Pollet
type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to