Please don't include any font with ambiguous licensing! Wouldn't want to bring back a fonts clause to the license!
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:33 AM, Adrian Lienhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 30, 2008, at 10:35 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> http://www.pinvoke.com/font/ >> >> I think that for the demo mode we should get a better font since italic "" >> is not working well. > > Yes, and not only for the demo font, but *all* default fonts should be > reconsidered now that we have the machinery in place. > > I don't think that the fonts of www.pinvoke.com/font/ are particularly well > suited. > > From a mail I sent on September 22, considering the code font I wrote: > > I think Bitstream Vera Sans Mono would be quite good. > I slightly prefer Monaco, which is shipped with OS X, but I don't know its > license (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monaco_(typeface)). > > For an evaluation of programmer fonts see http://www.lowing.org/fonts/ > Another list can be found here: > http://wiki.macromates.com/Main/AlternativeFonts > The latter list, for example includes > http://www.ms-studio.com/FontSales/anonymous.html which looks nice too. > > Adrian > > >> >> Now it would be great to have a set of free font for pharo. >> >> stef >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
