I agree. Just to be clear - I use both because neither does all I need. Explorer is my default choice, but if I need to look at the innards of a String, I launch an Inspector. It seems like it would be easy enough to fix these in Explorer and then make that the default inspector.
I'm just returning to Squeak after 8 years and wondering if there are other reasons folks use Inspector instead of Explorer. -david On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:10 PM, David Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > I'd vote for the Explorer too, but I'd prefer to keep the name > Inspector and the action Inspect it. > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 6:32 PM, David Pennell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > We currently have both "inspect" and "explore". It would be nice to have > > one tool. I'd vote for "explore" as a base with some enhancements to > pick > > up the useful features from "inspect". > > -david > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
