Cool Don't get me wrong we are not against keith and you. We are just cautious. We are building Pharo and we do not want to destroy it with not clear extensions and "just package loading....It is easy it is a package" Stef
On Dec 4, 2008, at 12:12 AM, Matthew Fulmer wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 10:24:55PM +0100, St?phane Ducasse wrote: >> Because we did not have the time (and nobody took the time to look at >> the code >> and write a report for us on the extensions and status of MC1.5 and >> MC1.6) > > I'll take care of this. I am going to write up documentation and > changes, and some tests for the new features of MC1.5/1.6 when I > release mc1.6. I'm gonna make a real release out of 1.6 once I > finish SystemEditor, and overhaul the MC/OB integration. I also > think I'll try running the entire pharo update stream (minus mc > changes) through a 3.9.1 + mc1.6. I think that should be good > enough for you. I should have this ready in 2 or 3 months. In > the meantime, MC1.0 is working just fine. I've already merged in > most of pharo's mc changes into 1.5. > > -- > Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
