On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:21 AM, Keith Hodges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. Searching Universes is a pain
I do not (completely) agree. Using the OB-based browser, things are way better. You can search by category (which was already possible without), by name or by status (installed, upgradable, selected). > 5. Finding what depends upon what is a pain, you have to manually search This is not true. Open the browser, select your package and read the description. > 9. Universes is/was non-trivial to discard from the image if you want to > use it to build and discard it later. I never read anything about that before. What is the problem exactly? I agree with the other critics and would prefer to use Sake/Packages. However, I have several problems with Sake/Packages as well: 1. There is no state as far as I know. Which means that if both packages B and C depend on A, installing B then installing C will install A twice. 2. There is no graphical user interface to install packages. This is not a problem for me because I script everything but it can be problematic for newcomers. As soon as 1 is fixed, I could implement 2 using OB. Bye -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
