Thanks gwenael
I will intergrate your fix.
Now pharoers what do we do with _ and external code using [ : x
instead of [:x
for _
Gwenael proposed to have the parser been able to parse and fix the _
into :=
but also to be able to have a strict parser.
For :x we should have a parser that reject : x code.
But what do you think
On Dec 18, 2008, at 5:05 PM, Gwenael Casaccio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've discussed with Stephane and may be we can fix all the methods
> that have :
> _ instead of :=
> or some methods have [ : myArg ... ] instead of [ :myArg .... ]
>
> So we can use a parser that strictly check that we respect grammar.
> There is in this mail an attach file that contains the list of the
> classes and
> methods that are not corrects.
>
> Cheers,
> Gwenael Casaccio
>
>
>
> <parsingerrors.txt.zip>_______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
