On Dec 19, 2008, at 6:02 PM, David Pennell wrote: > I think you should get the agreements. Perhaps if you provided an > easier way to send the agreement than physical mail or fax (e.g. > signed, scanned and e-mail), you might get more signed agreements. > Sending international mail is not something us provincial American's > do very often.
Ooops. Ok for us european this is nearly normal mails :) May be could have a local guy collecting them for US. > My sweet wife stood in the post office line to figure out how much > postage it required. You can fax it to me or scan it and send it to me by mail. Stef > > -david > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected] > > wrote: > Hi guys > > sorry to insist on that point but should I get the license agreement > of commiters else we do not include their code? > or since the code is published on mantis and code published on mantis > is MIT we can use it. > > Personally I would favor that we do both > - collect the agreement from the good souls > - collect the fixed that are MIT and make sense. > > Stef > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
