On Dec 20, 2008, at 15:18 , Bill Schwab wrote: > Adrian, > > Loading SqueakMap might just prolong the pain. If I am following > correctly, the idea would be to use a universe to load the main > package > and then MC to grab the rest to my image to do what I want. The ideal > solution would be to get SSL registered in the universe. Is that the > idea?
Exactly. For this we need the help of people that provide stable versions of their packages for Pharo. So at the beginning we may not have all packages we wish, but I'd rather not put any package into that universe without knowing that it properly loads and works in Pharo. Adrian > > > Bill > > > > > Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. > University of Florida > Department of Anesthesiology > PO Box 100254 > Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 > > Email: [email protected] > Tel: (352) 273-6785 > FAX: (352) 392-7029 > >>>> [email protected] 12/20/08 5:16 AM >>> > In a recent discussion with Marcus and Lukas we came to the conclusion > that a package universe for Pharo 1.0 would be the best solution. > Somebody would be responsible to manage this universe and only add > packages that are tested and known to work. I think this is really > important that we have higher standards regarding external packages. > In my experience with SqueakMap, the chance that a package actually > works is less than the chance it is not working. This is a show > stopper for newcomers. > Our plan was to remove SqueakMap from Pharo-core, but I assume it > could be put into the universe so it can be loaded again. > > Cheers, > Adrian > > On Dec 20, 2008, at 01:04 , Bill Schwab wrote: > >> Damien, >> >> Thanks for making the new image. Is there a way to tell the image to >> display walkbacks instead of going straight into the debugger? >> >> The new image seemed a nice excuse to play catch-up, which means >> getting a few things loaded. >> >> Seaside - I recalled discussion of it, and quckly stumbled onto a >> closed bug report about >> >> ScriptLoader new universalInstaller universe install: 'Seaside'. >> >> That appears to work. The cryptography team's work will be >> important. >> This gets weird fast. I have a 3.9 image where it is installed >> correctly and works; I have very little idea how that happened. My >> subsequent installation attempts appear not to be complete. >> >> SqueakMap appears to be going away in Pharo. Replacing it appear to >> be >> Installer, ScriptLoader, and maybe some of your tools to build the >> developer images. Is there a clear correct way to install packages >> now? >> Put another way, if I make an attempt to sort out installing the >> cryptography and SSL classes in Pharo, how would recommend attacking >> it? >> >> Pharo is not even in beta yet, so no complaints, but I am missing >> something on how to go from a new core image to something that is >> ready >> for use. >> >> Bill >> >> >> >> Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. >> University of Florida >> Department of Anesthesiology >> PO Box 100254 >> Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 >> >> Email: [email protected] >> Tel: (352) 273-6785 >> FAX: (352) 392-7029 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
