yes On Dec 23, 2008, at 6:28 PM, Michael Roberts wrote:
> If i'm right in thinking Damien's Pharo-Dev images are early release > candidates going forwards for the Pharo image, without the one-click, > would it make sense to start naming them Pharo. i.e. drop the -Dev. > That way we could start to get consistent with our naming, get the > web documentation consistent etc. thoughts? > > cheers, > > Mike > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Adrian Lienhard <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Here is an answer for "what is Pharo?" >> >> There will be two images: >> "Pharo-Core": the image in which the development of Pharo takes place >> "Pharo": the image to develop your application with (= "Pharo-Core" + >> IDE tools [1]) >> >> "Pharo" is the image that will be officially shipped (packaged as a >> one-click image). "Pharo-Core" on the other hand will be important >> for >> deployment as it has a low memory footprint. >> >> Cheers, >> Adrian >> >> [1] http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Packages >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
