On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Stéphane Ducasse < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi ramon > > Yes I know > now I was wondering why we got this in the *sixx category? > Because a changeset I harvested had a method in a *sixx category. This was a mistake (I should have delted it before filing it in). Marcus > > Stef > > On Dec 23, 2008, at 10:37 PM, Ramon Leon wrote: > > >> Subject: [Pharo-project] there is a sixx left over in Object > >> > >> sixxInstVarNamed: instVarName put: aValue > >> "override if you like" > >> self > >> instVarAt: (self class instVarIndexFor: > >> instVarName asString) > >> put: aValue > >> > >> Does anybody know where is come from? > > > > It's from the SIXX package, see Universe / Persistence / SIXX. SIXX > > is an > > XML serializer/deserializer written in Smalltalk. > > > > Ramon Leon > > http://onsmalltalk.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Marcus Denker -- [email protected] http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~denker
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
