On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 14:27, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: > yes but so far none of the moprh class specialised this method.
it's not used => remove it > On Dec 24, 2008, at 2:00 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> It depends whether it makes sense or not to have a different threshold >> for objects. I'm not convinced by that threshold thing. If you need to update something, either you have realtime constraints, or you just want to limit CPU usage, in which case it's the scheduler's responsibility to respect whatever low priority you give to the update task… no? -- Damien Pollet type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
