On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 00:47, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> wrote: >> My first reaction is "why is it not Smalltalk?" Not the name, but the >> language itself. Is there something I missed/should read to understand it? > > +1 , i don't understand too, what makes 'scripting' in smalltalk too > different than writing in smalltalk :)
Smalltalk only has syntax for method bodies, it lacks a (practical) one for declaring packages/classes/categories/method declarations in a single block of text. -- Damien Pollet type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
