On 2009-01-27 11:05:49 -0200, Lukas Renggli <[email protected]> said:
>> I'm trying to understand why pharo modifies squeak behavior of >> ifNotNil: and introduces the optional parameter... is there a reason? > > Squeak for that matter is incompatible with all other existing > Smalltalk implementations. Luckily that was changed in Pharo. the > compiler can easily figure out if an argument needs to be passed into > the block or not. There is really no need for all these ugly #...Do: > methods. > > Lukas Yes, I understand... but now I have a compatibility issue with OB-Tools (works on pharo, doesn't works on squeak) :( Anyway, I understand :) Cheers, Esteban _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
