On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: >> So again I am not complaining about the fact that you haven't looked >> at >> this or that bit of code. Your response of "we havent had time to look >> at that " winds me up, because I hear it as "we havent had time to >> audit >> your potentially inferior code that might be below us to use." and >> that >> very attitude misses the point completely. >> >> All of Stef objections, demonstrate that this is how he sees it. >> >> I am complaining that you see the issue as a bunch of "potentially >> inferior" code contributions to your cause, rather than "we have >> something to contribute to the community of SUnit and MC users, >> because >> MC and SUnit are frameworks that everyone uses and depends on."
We believe your work (MC, SUnit, Sake and Packages) is important enough for an integration into Pharo. We don't want to consider it as an external package. But for that, Pharo's maintainers must have a look at the code and decide if it is safe to include. Your code is not of lower quality. Have a nice day and please continue working on these tools -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
