> As for Pharo and whether Squeak code from those places will work on  
> Pharo,
> for now, yes, most of it does; however, as Pharo continues to grow and
> differentiate itself from Squeak, eventually it'll have to be  
> considered a
> separate platform that is no longer Squeak compatible.  That is  
> rather the
> point, it just so happens the fork is recent enough that it's still
> basically Squeak 3.9 but that won't last forever.  Pharo is not  
> Squeak, so
> it'll be interesting to see how much of the community it captures  
> and it all
> unfolds.

We will see but our goal is not to captures people :)
Our goal is to open a free space for good, clean and robust software.
I would love to see all kind of software running on top of pharo
        - education
        - web
        - new languages

the real problem with squeak was that we got stuck in death kiss with  
the past.
I like experiment made by people but experiment should be either  
cleaned, used,
maintained... or belong to the past.

> Me, I'm just a working programmer and this is all just my opinion, but
> that's how it all looks to me.  Squeak paid my bills, Pharo is  
> replacing it.
> Good riddance to the silly mouse, name, and look, and hello to a  
> serious
> business oriented open source Smalltalk that I'm not embarrassed to  
> mention
> to clients.

Yes the look, the look and the look. :)
Money is not evil and I have been thinking that it would be great if  
we could build a community
of companies that could offer Pharo enhancements (kind of support but  
in a bounty way).
For now we should get 1.0 out of the door but after that this would be  
the time to think about
that.

Stef


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to