On Feb 14, 2009, at 2:14 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > > On Feb 14, 2009, at 13:54 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> TX!!!! >> I think that we should be more aggressive with the tools we have. >> I'm currently going over the 25000 issues raised by SmallLint and >> entering issues in the bugtracker. > > wow, great! > >> I think that we will need to add annotations so that smallLint does >> not get warning us >> when we know that this is not a problem > > yes, this is very important. We do that with pragmas (see Lukas' > mail). Lint rules are part of the conventional tests and the rule is > that these must be green. There are cases where Lint complains but you > know it is ok. If we couldn't annotate these methods as ok, the whole > thing would not work. > > In the long term, I think it would be really cool if we manage to get > the Pharo core Lint-clean!
YESYESYES!!! We have great tools and an extremely powerful language and we should use them to make the code robust, nice and cool. Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
