>>
>>
>>>>    We will include it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, we will try with Pharo then.
>>>> Lautaro Fernández
>>> I am confused. Surely you would expect a loadable package to remain
>>> loadable and only be called up if needed?
>>
>> Although I'm normally the first to argue against including more stuff
>> into the core image I think Announcements need to be part of core.
>> This will allow us to have *one* mechanism for signaling/ 
>> subscribing and
>> can over time replace the different variants that are now used and
>> provide a solid base for anyone needing such a mechanism.
>> In the experimental forks I have worked on having Announcements
>> available made all the difference.
>>
> Does that mean that the EventManager, package System-Object Events and
> the methods in Object will be replaced by that? If yes I'm all for it!

Would be nice.
I think that this is a reaslistic goal.
But not for 1.0 :)
>
>
> Norbert
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to