On Feb 27, 2009, at 12:02 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Stéphane Ducasse > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I have problems to understand why this would be not reasonable that >> people load a give kom version for seaside on squeak >> and one for seaside on pharo. > > The problem is that people load released versions from SqueakMap or > Package Universe. As long as Pharo shares the Squeak Package Universe > there is no way of cleanly deciding which version of Kom to load.
ok now we can say that we have one Universe for Pharo so does it help solving the problem? > In the long term (for upcoming version) we will have to decide what > platform to support. I guess this will be Pharo 1.0 as soon as it has > been released. It is too much trouble to keep the installers > up-to-date and try to test and make them work on different versions > and platforms. I imagine that pretty well. > I suggest that people stick with Squeak 3.9.1 or early > versions of Pharo for now. So may be we should tagged one version for alpha-pharo seasider and we take the decision that there will be a KOM for pharo and one for Squeak. Now I can integrate the changes of mike but I need a seaside creating the Pharo-KOM and testing that everything is ok. > > > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
