Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > On Feb 25, 2009, at 5:59 PM, Michael Rueger wrote: > >> Lukas Renggli wrote: >>>> what seasiders think? >>>> I would be in favor to get a KOM pharo version >>> Having two incompatible versions of Kom makes distribution even more >>> painful as it is today. I would prefer to have compatible versions if >>> this is possible. >> As I said, we are at or at least close to the point where we have to >> make the decision which version to support. If you want to have Pharo >> stay compatible with Squeak, we can just as well abandon Pharo now. >> It's as simple as that. > > No else we would not have done pharo. > The point is more how can we help people migrating to pharo. > Probably having a specific Kom version.
You help people if you have a maintained version of Kom (see other mail). If you don't have a maintained web server then you are hurting people. Simply making a fork of Kom is not maintenance, on the contrary. Philippe _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
