Indeed.  john you are probably right and it can be a good way to make  
sure that one bold guy
will build a unix VM and this way we can avoid a deadlock

On Mar 4, 2009, at 8:01 PM, John M McIntosh wrote:

> If the unix vm hasn't been updated with basic fixes or even critical
> fixes  for the last two years, why would you put it on the critical
> decision path?
>
> The macintosh VM is available now, and I'd guess a windows VM should
> be available since no-doubt qwaq has been building a windows one for
> bleeding edge deployment since
> all this work (and more) is being funded by qwaq.
>
>
> On 4-Mar-09, at 9:19 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>> sounds a good attitude.
>> We should fix the rest of the items then.
>>
>> Stef
>>
>> On Mar 4, 2009, at 6:00 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
>>
>>> Do the major VMs (Unix, Mac, Win) support this *now*?
>>> What is the required work to include the closure changes (are they
>>> published somewhere?)?
>>>
>>> I'd like to avoid that we get a dependency on VMs that would delay
>>> version 1.0. If everything is ready, though, I would also vote for
>>> including them now.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Adrian
>>>
>
> --
> =
> =
> =
> = 
> = 
> ======================================================================
> John M. McIntosh <[email protected]>
> Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd.  http:// 
> www.smalltalkconsulting.com
> =
> =
> =
> = 
> = 
> ======================================================================
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to