Indeed. john you are probably right and it can be a good way to make sure that one bold guy will build a unix VM and this way we can avoid a deadlock
On Mar 4, 2009, at 8:01 PM, John M McIntosh wrote: > If the unix vm hasn't been updated with basic fixes or even critical > fixes for the last two years, why would you put it on the critical > decision path? > > The macintosh VM is available now, and I'd guess a windows VM should > be available since no-doubt qwaq has been building a windows one for > bleeding edge deployment since > all this work (and more) is being funded by qwaq. > > > On 4-Mar-09, at 9:19 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> sounds a good attitude. >> We should fix the rest of the items then. >> >> Stef >> >> On Mar 4, 2009, at 6:00 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: >> >>> Do the major VMs (Unix, Mac, Win) support this *now*? >>> What is the required work to include the closure changes (are they >>> published somewhere?)? >>> >>> I'd like to avoid that we get a dependency on VMs that would delay >>> version 1.0. If everything is ready, though, I would also vote for >>> including them now. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Adrian >>> > > -- > = > = > = > = > = > ====================================================================== > John M. McIntosh <[email protected]> > Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http:// > www.smalltalkconsulting.com > = > = > = > = > = > ====================================================================== > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
