Next I tried the Exupery profiler, but still the benchmark is not as good as without the compiler.
Hilaire 2009/3/7 Hilaire Fernandes <[email protected]>: > And the fourth benchmark with compiled methods > > > > 2009/3/7 Hilaire Fernandes <[email protected]>: >> 2009/3/7 <[email protected]>: >> >>> With these VMs you could load Exupery from either SqueakMap >>> or Universes and start it. Documentation is here: >> >> I installed exupery code in pharo 203, run the test, got 4 errors on >> #testBlockBug3, #testBlockNonLocalReturnRecycledContext, >> #testDelayWaitStreeTest, #testStressFailure1 >> >> Next I did three benchmarks on 3 different setups with DrGeo >> MessageTally spyOn [Carre new]. >> >> Carre new instanciate a DrGeo canvas with Smalltalk programmed figure, >> it results in a self-repeating sketch (see screenshot) >> >> 1. image with exupery runned with exupery VM >> 2. image without exupery runned with stock 3.9 VM >> 3. image without exupery runned with exupery VM >> >> I used exupery image Damien pointed to in his email. >> >> Do you want the images ? >> >> Hilaire >> > > > > -- > http://blog.ofset.org/hilaire > -- http://blog.ofset.org/hilaire _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
