On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Janko Mivšek <[email protected]>wrote:
> Michael Rueger pravi: > > Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > >> But they are not the same. Universe, monticello and SM are different > >> things. > > > I agree, and we will definitely have Universes. > > > > Me, personally, don't use SqueakMap at all anymore, but if people would > > like to keep it in Pharo I'm fine with it. > > But it is important that Universes UI is then "uplifted" to be as usable > as SqueakMap is. This tool is namely aimed for end users, not developers > and specially newbies need to have as simple as possible way to load > software. > > SM is close to that, Universes not. Universes has the biggest advantage > to load all prerequisite packages, but lacks other things like easy > search for packages, etc. > Totally agree. I would love having search option in universe or dependencies management in SM haha. > Best regards > Janko > > > -- > Janko Mivšek > AIDA/Web > Smalltalk Web Application Server > http://www.aidaweb.si > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
