On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2009/3/18 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>: > > Hi all > > > > I found this email really interesting. > > Especially the concurrent aspects. > > Clearly some nice research projects in perspective. > > Also the immutability bit supports would be great. > > > > I hear the magic word 'concurrency' .. :) > With green threading model we have a kind of concurrency on a language > level.. > except that its not scaling on to multiple native threads. > There were a lot of discussion around native threading support and > everyone agrees that less sharing means less problems. > From this point, running separate object memory per native thread seem > most perspective way. > Running single object memory on multiple native threads opens a can of > worms. And the complexity of VM implementation will be overwhelming. > If you want to use multiple CPU cores, I believe that ST/X and Gemstone both do this. I haven't tried though. Smalltalk/X: http://www.exept.de/ Gemstone: http://seaside.gemstone.com/ Gulik. -- http://gulik.pbwiki.com/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
