Thanks David, I will dive into it Cheers, Alexandre
On 19 Mar 2009, at 10:14, David Röthlisberger wrote: > Hi Alex, > >> Each OBNode understand the message definition. In the first version >> of >> OB, this definition method is supposed to return an instance of >> OBDefinition or one of its subclass. >> I saw a way to have a graphical object instead of the text pane. What >> is the trick to achieve this? > > What I did is to use OBClosableDefinitionPanel that has an > #exchangeContentWith: > aMorph method where you can pass any morph that gets displayed > instead of the text > that is usually there. > We could extend that to be able to also use "visualization > definitions" directly in > OBNode, but I haven't yet done this. The visualizations I added get > displayed on the > execution of a command, by default there is always a text definition > shown that can > get exchanged with a visualization at runtime. > > David > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
