you can also use the smalltalk tools.
        senders.
        implementers
        message tools
        
we say that a guy is ok in smalltalk when he understand senders and  
implementors.
Now you can also send this kind of message to the squeak and smalltalk  
community because I should be
guy that wrote the larger number of smalltalk book so I do not know  
how I could do more.

Stef

On Mar 27, 2009, at 6:51 PM, Robert Peters wrote:

>
> I agree with this sentiment.  I have been trying to learn Smalltalk  
> with the help of 'Squeak by Example', but while it is a good read,  
> it is almost useless as a reference.
>
> When I have a Python issue, I type (for example), "initialize multi- 
> dimensional array Python" into Google and get 14,000 responses.   
> Replace 'Python' with 'Smalltalk' and I get 2,000, most of which  
> aren't about Smalltalk, and I still haven't found a code example.
>
> There are a number of books on-line, but some don't even have tables  
> of contents or indexes, and they're all in .pdf, which makes them  
> extremely cumbersome to use as references.
>
> I, of course, only speak for myself, but I am officially closing my  
> current foray into Smalltalk.  It's too hard to learn.  There's not  
> adequate reference material.  There are very few code examples.
>
> If, at some point in the future, Smalltalk becomes easier to learn,  
> I will try again.  Until then, I'm going back to Python.
>
> I mentioned on the Pharo IRC channel that I was a Django developer,  
> and would consider building a site to assist with getting the  
> material inside these books onto the web, and I will continue to  
> think about that.  If there's any interest, please let me know.
>
> Kind regards,
> Robert Peters
>
>
> Having better comment than
>       buildWith: aBuilder
>               ^self subclassResponsibility
>
> is needed if we want to continue to bash Java people.
> So what do we do?
> Stef
>
>
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://n2.nabble.com/Better-documenting-and-consistency-tp2542850p2545717.html
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to