I think class GUID is orthogonal to namespace. I still would be able to argue really why GUID for classes are good (I mean really scientifically).
Stef On Mar 28, 2009, at 9:14 PM, Markus Fritsche wrote: > Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: > >> if you want to have a modular system then sharing a falt space is not >> ideal. > >>> Which walls? Ambiguity? > > I just think if the approach of Craig, using something like GUIDs > during > Class creation, and then referring to those GUIDs would be more > practical > than to use namespaces. > > Namespaces proved to be a pain in the ass with several > implementations, as > your "import *" example shows. We need to circumvent that... > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
