On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz <[email protected]> wrote: > 90% of my tests just test equality of a result to an expected value, > so I waste time trying to find out what the mismatch is. Would be > nice to have this method in SUnit: > > assert: result equals: expected > result = expected > ifFalse: [self signalFailure: 'Assertion failed: (' , result > asString , ') ~= (' , expected asString , ')'] > > Does anyone see a downside, or possible improvements?
No, there is no downside and no possible improvement. All other xUnit frameworks have that for a long time. I think Keith's version of SUnit has that too. -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
