Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote:
>> There were some notes traded by Eliot, on
>> WeakArray>>#finalizationProcess between Stephane, Marcus Denker,
>> Michael Rueger, Adrian Lienhard on this topic between march 26th -
>> April 2nd.
Was this conversation off-list? I can't find it here, on squeakvm or
squeak.general (or my eyes get old) ;-)
> Normally we should remove all the argument assignment.
> I just did not get the time to go over the next batch.
Well, I would have made it on my own (the pharo web image I'm on only
complained about the progressbar and imagesegment methods), but this one
explicitly stated that WeakArray (and therefor anything "weak") breaks if
the assignment is deleted (and it would be pointless to nil a temp val, I
agree), so I'm curious.
Btw., Is there a Closure-FFI somewhere? I tried to load the vanilla
FFI-Kernel-ar.8.mcz (and thereafter fixing the ExternalType method) but that
seriously killed my image (not sure if anything else interferred). And I
think it was the combination of WeakArrays not being weak and something of
the FFI-package. But I'm not sure, so I don't want to rant (let's say it
just happened coincidentally ;)).
Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
