On Apr 22, 2009, at 1:08 PM, Michael Rueger wrote: > Nicolas Cellier wrote: >> It is because InputEventFectcher does not take care to stop the >> fetcherProcess. >> I think it should: >> >> InputEventFectcher >>shutDown >> fetcherProcess ifNotNil: [fetcherProcess terminate]. >> inputSemaphore ifNotNil: [Smalltalk unregisterExternalObject: >> inputSemaphore] >> >> At least, it should do it on deinstall... > > I've integrate your suggestions, thanks!
Where ;)? > > >> IMO, it has been adopted too soon, and we should better revert >> temporarily with such a hack. > > Well, yes and no. > > Yes, it could have used a bit more testing, but the truth is that very > few people test stuff that is not in the update stream. > > No, we are still in alpha and anybody expecting the bleeding edge > version of Pharo to be stable enough for everyday work after every > single update doesn't know what "alpha" means. > > Michael > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
