I really do understand. Really! There is something really strange. I checked it. So I will redo it again thanks for spotting that.
On Apr 26, 2009, at 7:58 PM, Hernán Morales Durand wrote: > I'm using 10293cl and this fix still isn't integrated: > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=724 > > Cheers, > Hernán > > 2009/4/21 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>: >> this is strange since I merge and do not load. >> So I will redo that (reargh). >> >> Stef >> On Apr 21, 2009, at 1:34 AM, Nicolas Cellier wrote: >> >>> Pharo/Kernel-stephane_ducasse.renggli.293 has been lost >>> (overwritten by Kernel-stephane_ducasse.renggli.294 which has >>> Kernel-michael_rueger.renggli.292 as ancestor). >>> >>> Thus Pharo image 10287 miss Hernan stack top fix and a literals do: >>> fix >>> >>> This can be repaired by merge tool though... >>> While at it, why cannot we apply a chirurgical merge ? >>> I mean select or reject item by item >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
