Hi Guido, since the oracle adquisition of sun in april 20, don't forget to add to the list something like:
the only one that can say anything about its future is the Oracle board. Is obvious that oracle is only interested in java. Who can now say anything about valuable sun projects just vaporized by this adquisition? the industry will get stronger or weaker? for those products we can only wait and see. Right now there are plenty of scared sun consumers (not to mention mysql in pain pre-ex-users) sebastian > -----Mensaje original----- > De: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] En > nombre de stepken > Enviado el: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 21:16 > Para: [email protected] > Asunto: [Pharo-project] Thoughts about Pharo GUI > > Hi! > > Connecting Pharo to SUN Lively Morphic GUI: > > http://research.sun.com/projects/lively/ > > has lots of advantages: > > * decoupling of GUI and steering engine in hardware, like X-Server > from X.org > * independance of hardware and OS. > * speed - drawing canvas in SVG is implemented in C, steeting in > JAVA-Script. Google Chrome engine V8 is a ActionScript Jitter > (http://llvm.org/) and even offers OpenGL as C-lib > (Khronos) -> No > more plugin's into VM necessary for graphics, same with > vector-font libraries. > * comfort - You can develop your smalltalk software from > everywhere, > e.g. pharo vm installed at a webhoster ... or local > over loopback > interface. > * Lively and Squeak Morphic mental models fit perfectly, adaption > should be really easy. Dan Ingall being one of the designers of > Lively... > * Pharo's killer applications seaside and pier also are remote > applications, also using ActionScript and browser -> why not for > graphics, morphic and etoys? > * Chrome/FireFox tends to become the standard universal > visualisation and I/O toolkit for all OS, so why not being > lightyears ahead by consequently implementing the GUI > in Chrome/FF? > > few disadvantages: > > * sound, videostreaming, printing problematic, but easily > solvable, > because FF/Chrome already have that features built in ;-) > > I'm a bit disappointed by the fact, that the squeak / pharo > jitter still > has not the expected performance impact. Elliot does a good work, but > Frank Lesser with its DNG engine is showing actually, what is > technically possible ...C-Speed for Smalltalk and ! Apple is > behind LLVM > and JAVA 6 is showing also, that C-Speed can be reached in full > OO-Languages, see the "language shootout". By the way: > ActionScript is a > full OO-language, like Smalltalk. > > I really wondered, why not LLVM has become the standard > jitter in Pharo. > Power/ARM/Sparc/Intel ... processors are already supported! > > I think, any proprietary Jitter is a design fault ... > > just my 2 ct. > > Have fun, Guido Stepken > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
