On May 9, 2009, at 7:42 PM, Damien Pollet wrote: > On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 18:59, Stéphane Ducasse > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Come on this is only possible if the changes you do don't break on >> other code. >> else people will start to complain that we are polluting the >> repository with pharo specific version. > > Maybe, but I don't think so, provided it's clear the snapshots come > from pharo. Sure, it would be easier if MC and Squeaksource supported > branches, but…
OK I understand. > I'm just asking for some communication on what you fork, not for > backporting everything to Squeak. I think at least the minimum would > be to edit the project descriptions to indicate that they have a pharo > branch and where to look for it. Yes please do it since you are an admin > Another solution, for a small package like regex, would be to just > mark the latest not-pharo version, and take ownership of the project. I would prefer to make sure that people understand that they can use it and get a working version for their environment. So if you can publish a more recent version there and make sure that this is clear that this is working on pharo. This would be good. > > After all, the only non-pharo guy there is Avi. > > > -- > Damien Pollet > type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
