Aren't historic methods (Sequeak 1.0) already relicensed? 2009/5/17 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>: > Yes I will try to add the pharoers to the list and redo the list > After that there is also a list of method which do not have author. > I could not attach it to the wiki. So I will create a package with it. > > To answer your question read my reply to rob: this is the way I > generated the list. > > Stef > > On May 16, 2009, at 6:01 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > >> Hi Stef, >> >> How did you produce the list of methods you put on the wiki page? >> >> It seems this will be some work, but its certainly doable. Stuff like >> ScaleMorph, BlobMorph, SkipList, and ScaledDecimal do not need to be >> in the core anyway. We can extract them into external packages. >> >> I suggest that when we have an up to date list that takes Pharaoers >> into account, we start working through it and tag each method that is >> fixed. Changesets can be gathered in a single task in the tracker. >> >> Adrian >> >> On May 16, 2009, at 09:22 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> >>> Hi all >>> >>> I'm going over the list of authors that did not sign and will produce >>> a list of actions. >>> >>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ResultofRelicensing >>> >>> We will have probably to update the authorlist with the one of pharo. >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
