#argumentCount is important, it is part of the ANSI standard. Seaside uses it and we had to add our own version up to now.
Lukas On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Adrian Lienhard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On May 17, 2009, at 22:56 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> adrian >> may be we should add argumentCount to BlockClosure too. > > Yes, probably. > Adrian > >> >> >> Stef >> >> On May 17, 2009, at 10:20 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: >> >>> Hi Mariano >>> >>> BlockContext implemented #argumentCount (just delegating to #numArgs) >>> but BlockClosure does not. >>> >>> You can change the sender in GLORP to #numArgs or implement >>> BlockClosure>>#argumentCount >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Adrian >>> >>> On May 17, 2009, at 22:06 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Lukas Renggli <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I noticed that #argumentCount is missing in the class BlockClosure. >>>>> #argumentCount is part of ANSI and Seaside depends on it (for now >>>>> it >>>>> is part of Seaside-Closures). >>>>> >>>> >>>> I am trying to make GLORP work with Pharo and I get the same error: >>>> >>>> BlockClosure(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #argumentCount >>>> >>>> Actually, this is in Dialect #argumentCountFor: aBlock >>>> >>>> Do you know how should I fix this ? >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> Mariano >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Furthermore the following messages are missing #valueWithExit, >>>>> #valueSuppressingAllMessages, #valueWithEnoughArguments: on >>>>> BlockClosure, I guess these are used at various places within >>>>> Pharo. >>>>> >>>>> All the mentioned methods can be copied verbatim from BlockContext. >>>>> >>>>> Lukas >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Lukas Renggli <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> lukas do you want that we produce a backward compatibility layer >>>>>>> so >>>>>>> that old seaside code loads in pharo? >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry, I probably misunderstood your previous mail. >>>>>> >>>>>> After loading Seaside with the script above load: >>>>>> >>>>>> - Seaside-Closures-lr.1 from the Seaside 2.9 repository >>>>>> >>>>>> - DynamicBindings-damiencassou.9 >>>>>> - KomHttpServer-damiencassou.47 from the Kom repository >>>>>> >>>>>> And then you should have a Seaside with closures. >>>>>> >>>>>> Note that two tests for partial continuations fail, because they >>>>>> assume the old Squeak block behavior. Ignore them, these tests are >>>>>> wrong. >>>>>> >>>>>> Lukas >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Lukas Renggli >>>>>> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Lukas Renggli >>>>> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
