I imagine that people did not pay attention. I think that this is important that we polish even the "details". Today I did a lecture and students got excited by Smalltalk the concept and I would love that they get excited by Smalltalk the implementation. This is why beauty in the details is important. So if you have a fix and some tests :)
Stef On May 26, 2009, at 11:18 PM, Stephan Eggermont wrote: > While taking a look at Seaside issue 262 I noticed that > > SmartRefStream>>catalogValues: instVarList size: varsOnDisk > > creates a Dictionary with the default size, while having a pretty > good idea of how large it should at least be. Is this called so > little that that it doesn't matter?(it is only called in > SmartRefStream>>readInsanceSize:clsname:refPosn:) > > Stephan Eggermont > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
