On May 27, 2009, at 8:03 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:

> Stef,
>
> That would be nice for a temporary measure at least, because the  
> performance really has suffered.  Assuming you roll back, would it  
> be enough to update my 10303 image?

To rollback I will just issue a new update.
sorry for the problem one my machine I did not notice it.

Stef
>
>
> Bill
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected] 
> ] On Behalf Of Stéphane Ducasse
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 12:44 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 832
>
> Thanks for reporting.
> Henrik?
> I could rollback the changes.
>
> Stef
>
> On May 27, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Gary Chambers wrote:
>
>> Performance of UI seems poor after 832 integration.
>>
>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=832
>>
>> Regards, Gary
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to