On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected] > wrote:
> mariano > > did you use MC2? > I tried. I even publish SqueakDBX on sourcetalk, but I have several problems. I couldn't make it work well :( However, I think having a better control version system will help pharo. Even if you have to work and spend time in MC2. I was discussed several times in different mailing lists, but I really don't like monticello. What I don't like is that I always have to save a hole package instead of a simple class or a method. The level of unit in MC (packge) is too big for me. has Pharo a plan of using a better control version system ? cheers, Mariano > > > > > I think when Pharo has its own code repository should be using new > > monticello 2 and sourcetalk > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
