Hi Bill, AFAIK monticello use to get the first part of the class category to
define if code goes into a package or not.
Why don't you make your code go into a category named differently than something
named as an existent package?
cheers,
sebastian

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] En 
> nombre de Schwab,Wilhelm K
> Enviado el: Friday, May 29, 2009 03:56
> Para: [email protected]
> Asunto: [Pharo-project] Finding code
> 
> I am finding that OB, Moniticello, or just plain gremlins are 
> making life hard on me.  I have code that I want to package; 
> more specifically, I need to repackage some of it.  I thought 
> it might make sense to name something Seaside-ThisOrThat, but 
> that turns out to get burried in the Seaside 2 category, and 
> moving clases and methods to SeasideThisOrThat or another 
> package frequently locks up the image.
> 
> I have all of the relevant code captured in a change set.  Is 
> it safe to edit the categories in the chunks and file that 
> into a new image?  I did that (hopefully correctly) to a copy 
> of the change set in the hopes tha a new image would see 
> things in the correct place from the bginning.
> 
> If any of this sounds like typical newbie (re Monticello) 
> growing pains, please say so.
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to