That remind me http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-March/127168.html I proposed already to move SkipList in Squeaksource/Squeakmap and still agree on this ( http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-March/127217.html )
Ken Causey has shown good willing to do it at that time, but did not proceed, I don't remember why... Maybe because he could not decide about the license, or waited for author agreement? Ah yes, see: http://tunes.org/~nef//logs/squeak/08.04.04 So, who will take that job? Nicolas 2009/6/3 Adrian Lienhard <[email protected]>: > Hi Gabriel, > > Yes, it was also my intention to remove SkipList from the core. > > Not sure whether it makes sense to create an external package. Anybody > using SkipList? If there is no interest, I would not create it. Its > not lost as you can always go back and extract it from Squeak or an > earlier version of Pharo. > > Cheers, > Adrian > > > On Jun 3, 2009, at 02:01 , Gabriel Cotelli wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> 20 of the methods that are not license clean are part of SkipList and >> SkipListNode... >> >> I checked the core, dev and web image and there's no reference to this >> (except the tests) and asSkipList in Collection (with no senders)... >> >> I think it's better to move this out of the core to an external >> loadable >> package... but better to ask to the community first :) >> >> Comments are welcome. >> >> Thanks >> Gabriel >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
