> Besides programming effort, is there a reason why squeak/pharo > shouldn't consider going to a GUI model that includes real multiple > native windows?
I would love to have that we should have a look at ffenestria and fix it. So this is just that somebody should do it. > I'm not a c/c++ programmer and wouldn't know where to begin with > that piece, but inside of smalltalk it seems it wouldn't be all that > difficult of a refactoring. > > I only bring this up as this would put pharo/squeak more in line > with many other conventional languages (with respect to user > interfaces), and get it "back in the game" so to speak for when > technologies are being considered for business solutions. > > You could include in this 1) Native support for drag and drop and 2) > support for embedded native controls. Something like SWT and Jide > now both support. > > Sorry if I've overlooked something with this and the con is obvious. > > thanks > sw Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
