> Put the readLimit at 0 make sense for a WriteStream ( with witch
> your not supposed to read ) but when you create a ReadWriteStream on
> a collection you would be able to read what is already in the
> collection, no?
> I wonder why #on: has not been overriden in the instance side of
> ReadWriteStream ?
> Maybe it's not a good idea to create a ReadWriteStream with a
> collection that already includes elements ?
It looks like on: must be overridden in ReadWriteStream.
With ReadStream I have:
(ReadStream on: (1 to: 20)) next => 1
(ReadStream on: (1 to: 20)) next; next => 2
However, with ReadWriteStream, nil is returned, for the very problem
you mentioned:
(ReadWriteStream on: (1 to: 20)) next => nil
If I cut and paste PositionnableStream>>on: in ReadWriteStream, then I
have the behavior I expected:
(ReadWriteStream on: (1 to: 20)) next => 1
(ReadWriteStream on: (1 to: 20)) next; next => 2
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
