On Jul 8, 2009, at 12:53 PM, Andres Valloud wrote: > Well, but on the other hand, what happens when you do things like > 1.0 + > NaN or NaN + 1.0? It should work...
It will break further down the line though: (1.0 + NaN) < (1.0 + NaN) should that return NaB (not a Boolean)? Shouldn't obtaining NaN from arithmetic be modeled as a resumable exception, so the calling code can decide what kind of object to return as the value? (Instead of only one choice being hardwired in the system). R - _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
