>>>> Hi brad >>>> No :) >>>> We removed it ;) because it was a mess >>>> but I would like to have have a better one. >>>> We could imagine morph to use a creation method with a pragma and >>>> that a tool would query that pragma >>>> and we could get the morph. >>> >>> I agree that it was messy, from my inexperienced skillset. I would >>> love to have a way to create projects or books and populate with >>> graphics and multimedia for presentations. Pharo looks so nice and >>> it >>> seems to run quickly (could be my mind though) that it would be >>> great >>> to use. >> >> we will remove BookMorph because it is a giant huge terrible mess. >> Now if you want multimedia publishing or creation have you look at >> openSophie? > > I have looked at Sophie in a limited way.. First, it's Java now > (hmmmm..) But, kidding aside, I didn't particularity like the way > Sophie confined the space for objects. My perception might clearly be > a result of my limited use of (Squeak) Sophie, perhaps John can steer > me in the right direction. I also believe (Java) Sophie is just in > alpha and Squeak Sophie is not maintained. > > I just liked the way I could create presentations in Squeak - it > seemed open and I could create any new objects or tweak the old by > adjusting code.
I liked that too except that I lost my soul trying to do a loop to load projects for my presentation. In pharo there is bookmorph anymore (if someone wants to build a new one we would be happy but not one like the old one). I did a tiny project once to create slideMorph but this was not as complete as bookmorph but may be a start. Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
