Closure VM (Mac 4.1.1beta2U, using Damien's 4.10.2-7179web09.07 image base) with no updates, no patches, no fixes, nothing. Straight out of the box.
And by the way, it does feel more responsive (faster) than the Pharo image. (discussed on a different thread.) On Jul 18, 2009, at 3:52 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > which version are you using because this was removed at least 2 weeks > ago? So you are questioning Squeak right now, correct (even though this is the Pharo list). -Cam > > Stef > >> In Pharo, I originally create created the class with this: >> >> Object subclass: #FaFnBasicKeyLabelAssociations >> instanceVariableNames: '' >> classVariableNames: 'theSingleton' >> poolDictionaries: '' >> category: 'FA-FinanceMeta' >> >> And it compiled without complaint in Pharo. >> >> It was Squeak that complained during a load using Monticello. And >> just now, I reverted back to the lower case version (as exampled up >> above) and throws an "Error: theSingleton class variable name should >> be capitalized; proceed to include it anyway" ... and it lets me >> proceed. (I didn't read the full message previously and changed it.) >> So Squeak allows it, but complains where Pharo didn't. >> >> Sounds like it was "by design" in both cases. >> >> (I have three spinoff questions which I will put forth with a >> different subject line.) >> >> Thanks, >> Cam >> >> >> On Jul 17, 2009, at 6:04 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> >>> this is strange can you show us the class definition. >>> >>> We removed the hard check that >>> enforced that classVariable should be capitalized and instvar >>> starting >>> with a lower case. >>> >>> Lukas wrote some smallLint rules to check that >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> On Jul 17, 2009, at 9:30 PM, Cameron Sanders wrote: >>> >>>> I just loaded the code I have been developing in Pharo into Squeak >>>> (closure VM, using 4.10.2-7179web09.07 image base) and it had one >>>> complaint while loading: >>>> >>>> Squeak (seemingly) requires an initial cap on class variable names. >>>> [Maybe it allows it... but it popped up the debugger on an MC >>>> load.] >>>> >>>> Does Pharo allow the symbol to start with lower case by design, or >>>> was >>>> that act of omission? I am merely raising point to make certain it >>>> is >>>> an act of commission. >>>> >>>> -Cam >>>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
