On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:39:07 +0200, Igor Stasenko wrote: > 2009/7/24 Klaus D. Witzel : ... >>> So, what i'm proposing: ... >>> then simply: >>> Smalltalk at: #Smalltalk put: (SmalltalkImage current). >> >> This part will not work, check yourself: >> >> (Smalltalk associationAt: #Smalltalk) inspect >> > in what way it wont work?
I was responding to a practical issue, not a conceptual one; try Smalltalk at: #Smalltalk put: Smalltalk then you should see why that's not possible. > I can implement #associationAt: in SmalltalkImage class, to proxy it > to globals ivar. What's wrong with it? With #associationAt: in SmalltalkImage? nothing, if it still makes sense. > Or do you mean, that we will end up with the need of proxying all > Collection protocol methods? Some of them: yes; unless you get rid of "Dictionary" users' view. > There always can be more radical solutions, like proxying rest of > stuff through DNU handler :) :) >> /Klaus _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
