On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Miguel Cobá<[email protected]> wrote: > I have tested the SLICE of issue 981 on a new Pharo 10401 beta image > and an updated 10402 > image and it loads without problems. > > Should I mark this as milestone 1.0 or isn't elegible for this first release? > I know that my opinion is biased, but I think that the 1.0 version of > pharo should have the > initials problem solved in order to base all the subsecuent code not > to depende on initials. > > Comments? > Has anyone confirmed that the functionality is correct? > What about the format of the name and the message prompt?
Normaly, during in beta phase, no new functionality should be commit, only bug patches. But maybe you can consider this one as a patch ;-) -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)] http://doesnotunderstand.org/ _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
