ok with me. Stef
On Aug 2, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > > On Aug 1, 2009, at 18:33 , Marcus Denker wrote: > >> >> On 01.08.2009, at 07:06, Serge Stinckwich wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Stéphane >>> Ducasse<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> So what is the process now? >>>> Do we focus on 1.0? >>>> Can we integrate other issues? >>>> Do we have a separate stream for 1.1 alpha? >>> >>> Maybe the 1.1 alpha should be available after the release of Pharo >>> 1.0 >>> so the efforts of the team is not disseminate on two versions. >> >> Yes, I think this is the way to go... we should force everyone to use >> the >> beta version for a while. > > Yes. We have 50 open issues for 1.0 and when more people start using > Pharo, they will find more bugs. So for now we should focus on > bringing that number down to 0. > > Adrian > >> >> Marcus >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Marcus Denker - http://marcusdenker.de >> PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
