OK, I can take a look to merge or remove it this week. Maybe its a good idea to have this functionality in the image instead of an external package (like this is will be easier to do license audits in the future).
Adrian On Aug 9, 2009, at 22:13 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > Adrian > > if the behavior in MethodAuthorship is better we can just removed what > I integrated. > There is no problem. > Let me know. > > Stef > > > On Aug 9, 2009, at 5:17 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > >>> - Issue 1054: Cuis code author CUIS code author checking code >>> SystemNavigation default contributorsNotSignatories >>> SystemNavigation default allContributors >>> SystemNavigation default contributionsOf: ... >> >> Stef, what is the difference to the Methodauthorships package that >> we've use for the license cleaning [1]? It seems that now we have a >> duplicated and obsolete list of signatories in the image. Or did you >> merge? >> >> Cheers, >> Adrian >> >> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/LicenseCleanEffort >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
