would be nice to save a script and its png.
Now can you have use relationships?

Stef

On Aug 14, 2009, at 4:53 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

>>> Is DrDoc on SqueakSource? I'll take a look.
>>
>> Yes I would be more than happy if someone could take the lead there.
>> I could embed images (UML diagram).
>
> It could maybe be used with Mondrian :-)
>
> Alexandre
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> - Brian
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Stef
>>>>
>>>>>> So far we should invent it.
>>>>>> And I totally agree with you. If people do not see the good doc
>>>>>> they
>>>>>> will not write good comment.
>>>>>> I started to work on DrDoc a kind of package meta data to add
>>>>>> documentation to a package but it got stole
>>>>>> I should push that again. What would be nice is to take one
>>>>>> package
>>>>>> and do it well as an example.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It think it should be possible to write documentation at the
>>>>>> package level. So developpers have a place where they can write  
>>>>>> an
>>>>>> overview of their package. When we click on a package,
>>>>>> documentation should be displayed by default or easily.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes! Here is a post I made in April of 2003:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> The biggest frustration with using comments is that there is no
>>>>>> good
>>>>>> "starting place" for a given class category. For example, go
>>>>>> browse
>>>>>> the Seaside classes and categories and figure out where one  
>>>>>> should
>>>>>> start. You can repeat this exercise for any number of
>>>>>> categories. I
>>>>>> propose that we we add a documentation attribute to the
>>>>>> PackageInfo
>>>>>> stuff, so there is a category level documentation spot, with  
>>>>>> links
>>>>> to
>>>>>> the appropriate class comments.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>> I didn't get any response, and I sent a similar type of thought to
>>>>> Stef recently, but he's so busy I don't even know if he read my
>>>>> email :)
>>>>>
>>>>> - Brian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the rubygems world, it is a common practice to write
>>>>>> documentation in a README file which is displayed by RDoc on
>>>>>> startup page (github works the same way). It seems to me that
>>>>>> there's the same level of comment between Ruby class/methods and
>>>>>> Pharo. The documentation at the package level may be the
>>>>>> difference.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Python has a real documentation effort.Each release come with its
>>>>>> up to date documentation. It's a release criteria. Python shares
>>>>>> some similarities with Pharo as they both have "batteries
>>>>>> included". May be there should have a process to contribute to a
>>>>>> centralized Pharo documentation which can be accessed within the
>>>>>> IDE.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Laurent.
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-
>>>>>> project
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- 
>>>>> project
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
> -- 
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to