On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K<[email protected]> wrote:
> I am not sure how much of this is self-inflicted and how much is already 
> fixed; perhaps someone can remind me of a solution that already exists.  If 
> not, think of it as a wish list.
>
> I have typically never liked so-called "system browsers" because they tend to 
> show classes alphabetically and hide inheritance relationshiops; that's 
> really important in trying to understand a design.  The toolset I am using 
> now is reasonably fast (in fact, it's perfectly fine on my new quad core box, 
> but I hate throwing hardware at efficiency problems) but it not the bleeding 
> edge.  The system browsers do not show hierachies, and the [hierarchy] 
> buttons spawn off something that often shows only one of the paths from a 
> super class.  IIRC, I've seen a browser that does better, but I can't 
> remember which one it was or whether it can run fast enough to work on most 
> of the hardware I see every day.
>
> Sorry for the complaining tone of the above; I don't mean it that way, but I 
> also do not have time to fix it right now.

I don't really understand your problem. In all Pharo images, the
default System Browser orders classes of the selected package/category
hierarchically and not alphabetically.

-- 
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

"Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them
popular by not having them." James Iry

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to